View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 31, 2025, 12:52pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
I agree with JRutledge about the purpose of Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.'s thread.

Why was it posted?

I did, and in some respects still do, have some questions about the rule change.

With a new definition of basket interference, it appears that we will now, for the first time ever, may be allowed to award a basket if the vibration caused by a slap, intentional or otherwise, affects the try.

Fans have been pleading for this for at least forty-four years.

It doesn't appear to be "automatic", the slap and vibration have to affect the ability of the ball to enter the basket.

At the same time, if a defensive player intentionally slaps the backboard, with no intent to try to block the try, this is still a player technical foul, whether the ball enters the basket, or not.

In essence, in some specific cases we can both award the basket (basketball interference) and additionally charge a technical foul.

Do I have this interpretation correct?
All I will say is this came from the college side; let us not reinvent the wheel. It has been done for years before.

Also, in my time, I can hold on maybe one hand where a player slapped the backboard and was not trying to in some way block the shot. But if it does happen, I guess we have some options now.

But this is again not an automatic thing; it is a judgment thing. You have to factor things in play just like you did before, but with possibly a different result.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote