View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 18, 2024, 08:31pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,005
Sit B part c does not mesh with the rule as currently written in the NFHS book. There is no consideration of time elapsed for this violation.

Sit C has the correct ruling, but for the wrong reason. The try has nothing to do with this action. There simply is no longer a rule preventing a defender from leaving the court to avoid a screen.
Reply With Quote