Thu Oct 31, 2024, 10:02am
|
|
Esteemed Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,195
|
|
|
IAABO Interpretation ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
|
IAABO Interpretation:
The team in white jerseys gained frontcourt status when White #3 saved the ball near the sideline. She threw it toward the division line, which landed in the backcourt. The ball now had backcourt status, when it was recovered by White #2 standing in the frontcourt.
This was correctly ruled a backcourt violation.
In most cases, a backcourt violation is caused by a player who has backcourt status. When this occurs, the ensuing throw-in should be awarded to the opponents in their frontcourt at the nearest of the four frontcourt designated throw-in spots.
In this case, the violation was caused by a player who had frontcourt status. Since the player had frontcourt status, the ensuing throw-in is a backcourt throw-in at the spot nearest to where the violation occurred.
In this play, the officials correctly awarded the ball in the backcourt along the sideline.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
|