View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 31, 2024, 11:16am
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
Have any state associations now decided to modify to the closely guarded rule with the 35-second shot clock, allowing players to dribble the ball for more than five seconds while closely guarded?

Have any state associations made the decision not to modify the closely guarded rule?

Have any state associations already made the closely guarded change in the past, or distant past (you rebels) before getting "permission" from the NFHS?

I have not heard anything about Connecticut. We did not make the closely guarded change last year with our new shot clocks.


Billy:

I do not know that answer to your question. What surprised me though is the fact, per the NFHS, that 27 states used a Shot Clock for the 2023-24 school year.

I have been registered: OhioHSAA (since 1971-72), FloridaHSAA (1973-77), CaliforniaIF (1982-84 through the COBA), and MichiganHSAA (1984-2017).

The CIF is the only time I officiated H.S. basketball with a Shot Clock and back then in girls' H.S. games. The CIF used NFHS Rules but had adopted the NAGWS (and then the NCAA Women's) Shot Clock Rules as well as the No Backcourt Violation and No Ten-Second Backcourt Violation Rule.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote