Quote:
Originally Posted by IUgrad92
0:48 left second half FAU/NW.
Backcourt violation on NW. FAU given the ball clost to half-court, but only given a 20 second shot clock?
|
Should not have been a BC violation since the defense deflected the ball at least once (probably twice) on that play. But since a BC violation was called, it was administered properly with the shot clock set at 20 seconds and the throw-in from the 28' line.
I wonder why the deflected throw-in at 0:49 of OT wasn't reviewed. NW deflected it and FAU did not touch it, yet the NW was given possession. It would have been no harm to review and would have corrected an IC that went against the team that was losing.