Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I did not see it as an issue because we did not ever have to worry about it. Because if the situation took place as I stated, no way I am penalizing a team because they could not fit a kid.
|
No need to worry about it in the past because, for at least the past forty years, there was absolutely no color restriction on shorts. Only those who didn't understand the rule (or lack of a rule, if it's not illegal, it's legal) had "issues". If any state associations, local officials organizations, or individual officials allowed multiple color shorts, it was a redundancy, no exception was necessary for an imaginary rule that didn't exist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Only once in my career did a kid have a completely different color pant than the jersey that clearly did not go with the school's uniform ... And if that happened, it would be very hard-pressed to penalize this team with anything because that took place.
|
And in the past, if anyone penalized this player, or this team, they would be 100% wrong by NFHS rule (or lack of a rule, if it's not illegal, it's legal).
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
... Because if they wanted to make it like the other rules with the sleeves or the headbands they would have used the same language.
|
Agree, "like color" is very odd language, not appearing anywhere else in the rulebook, casebook, or annual interpretations, but it has to mean something, something that has to do with colors.
Same? Similar? Something else?
I can foresee some state associations making exceptions to this new rule, especially for subvarsity games. And if they don't, I can see some officials organizations making exceptions to this new rule for the middle schools that they service, as my local board already does regarding some uniform and equipment rules in middle school games, for example, illegal numbers.