BBR I understand what you are saying, but I respectfully disagree!
While I understand your interpretation and could officiate under it, I do not believe your interpretation was the intent of the rules committee.
I also agree that their wording on page 2 has a hugh conflict with the wording within 8-2-2, the wording on Page 67, and the wording on Page 73. I believe the person that wrote page 2 did not understand the impact his conflicting words would make, however I believe the person who wrote page two was in error just as I believe the committee overlooked Situation 15 when they wrote the rule. (I also believe they overlooked Situation 13 when they wrote the PSK rule.)
I agree with you that next year this situation should be resolved with the issue of the new rule books along with (several?) other conflicts!
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber 
|