Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
... a ruling is wrong ...
|
This is the answer I was looking for.
Thank you.
However, technically, the ruling, "In (a), illegal", isn't really wrong, the action described is most certainly illegal.
The rulings are worded poorly and ambiguous by
implying two different rulings, while the only real difference is team control versus "regular" foul,
both of which should be upgraded to intentional fouls, not just the "regular" foul.
Here's how the caseplay should have been written.
A1 is dribbling in the frontcourt. A3 and B4 are in the lane. (a) A3 throws B4 to the floor; (b) B4 throws A3 to the floor. RULING: In both (a) and (b), intentional foul due to excessive contact while the ball is live. While many team control fouls (and player control fouls) do not result in free throws, an intentional foul is
always penalized by awarding the offended player two free throws and the ball for a throw-in.