Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
What's the point of this casebook play? What are we supposed to learn from this casebook play? Why two different rulings (are they really different)? Since both acts are described exactly the same, shouldn't both be deemed intentional fouls if one is deemed an intentional foul?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Can't anybody answer these questions?
|
The
bolded question has already been answered by me (and maybe others):
Quote:
|
This is definitively not true by any interpretation of the rules ...
|
You even quoted my answer previously.
Is there somebody in the forum from the NFHS who can answer your first 3 questions? I wasn't aware there was.