|
What's The Point ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
4.19.3 SITUATION E: A1 is dribbling in the frontcourt. A3 and B4 are in the lane. (a) A3 throws B4 to the floor; (b) B4 throws A3 to the floor. RULING: In (a), illegal and in (b), intentional foul due to excessive contact while the ball is live. (4-19-3d)
I see only one difference between these two fouls. One, by A3, is a team control foul, and the other, by B3, isn't a team control foul.
Since both are described in the same exact manner, player throws his opponent to the floor, why is only one deemed intentional?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB
Definitely missing context or different meanings here.
|
What's the point of this casebook play? What are we supposed to learn from this casebook play? Why two different rulings (are they really different)? Since both acts are described exactly the same, shouldn't both be deemed intentional fouls if one is deemed an intentional foul?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
|