Quote:
Originally Posted by oc
Interesting play. I agree with officials final call-intentional foul. Anyone who wants to argue this should be flagrant, I can see a case for that as well.
But I came to ask something different:
1. When can you review foul calls in NCAA?
2. Is there a reason player is allowed taped earrings?
3. At the 4:29 mark--Announcer still is using wrong terminology, correct?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95OkOX0tfEc |
1. That is a weighted question. There are a lot of times you can reveiw foul calls. I guess you could ask a more direct question. Also different between Men's and Women's basketball as well.
2. Have no idea. I was not there and none of us were.
3. Probably because Women's basketball went from one set of language for certain fouls and in the last few years changed that language to what they have now. Again Men's basketball I believe they would be more correct. Just like the term you used to start this post, the level matters what you mean by "flagrant." Any elbow play at the Men's NCAA level can be ruled flagrant, but that does not mean they have the same penalty based on what kind of flagrant foul you call (Flagrant 2 requires and ejection, Flagrant 1 does not).
Peace