Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
That’s because there had been possession and the IW came a second or so later.
Why would you go to the arrow for an IW when a team was in control?
|
I still think they ruled it a SC violation.
If it was ruled a possession by SPU on the end-line jump, then Purdue #2 regains possession, and the IW comes just as the SPU player stabs at the ball to knock it loose (before he secured possession).
I don't see how they make it SPU's ball unless they rule it a SC violation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
Game clock doesn't stop just because the shot clock hits zero, so that doesn't make sense.
|
I didn't understand this part either, but it's what the officials told the media crew at 5:25 in the YouTube video, posted above. *shrug*
If it's possession by SPU and then an IW after Purdue #2 secured and was dribblng with the ball, then it should be Purdue's ball right?
If it's possession by SPU and then an IW after SPU stabbed at the ball to knock it loose, then it should be arrow, right?
If it's an SC violation by Purdue and ruled not possession, it should be SPU's ball on the violation, but I would assume SC gets reset to 30 and game clock gets reset to 2:41 when SC violation occured, right?
Did they rule possession by SPU, then possession by Purdue, then possession by SPU after stabbing the ball? Problem with this is that Purdue #2 stops pursuing the loose ball when he hears the whistle, resulting in SPU ending up with it.
Not challenging any of you, just trying to understand it myself. The net result didn't seem to make sense and I couldn't find any official explanations anywhere.