Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
...
The cherry on top of the sundae is that it is not illegal for such a player to set the ball down and stand up.
It is illegal for such a player to set the ball down, stand up, and touch the ball, an interpretation apparently not well understood by Ms. Atkinson.
What else isn't well understood by Ms. Atkinson?
|
As I said before, I'm confident she is quite aware touching the ball again is part of the violation. Because, like I said before, otherwise the violation would be for simply putting the ball down.
She is not writing a formal thesis, she is counting on common sense that touching ball again assumed.