Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Here are the clear facts: The play involves an airborne shooter. Rule 6-7-9 tells us that the ball does not become dead until the airborne shooter returns to the floor, despite a whistle for a goaltending violation. Therefore, the ball remains live following the goaltending. It only becomes dead when airborne shooter A1 commits a charging foul prior to returning to the floor as this is a player control foul per 4-19-6 and 6-7-4 states that a PC makes the ball dead. Now we simply penalize the actions in order of occurrence. Award points for the goaltending, and then award Team B a throw-in with the privilege of running the endline due to the awarded goal. The principle which controls this situation is that the ball does not become dead until the airborne shooter either returns to the floor or commits a PC foul.
|
Thanks for he great explanation Nevadaref.
But how can we have two dead balls on the same play?
6-7-9, the goaltending, makes the ball dead first. Check its pulse, it's dead.
Then 6-7-4, the player control foul, give the ball the coup de grâce and makes it really dead for good.
What's the rule citation for the "zombie" ball between the goaltend and the player control foul?
Why does one act make the ball "deader" than the other act?
Dead is dead? Like a door nail? Right?