View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 25, 2021, 10:47pm
Camron Rust Camron Rust is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I’m taking your scenario of the rebounding foul to occur prior to any player touching the ball. Therefore, the clock has not properly started and the error of awarding unmerited FTs is correctable. Hence, both FTs and all activity which occurred during them are canceled. However, the rebounding foul stands as it happened after the FT ended. So proceed to the other end and award bonus FTs to the Team B player who was fouled by A2.
On this one, I really wonder if the NFHS was really being loose with their terminology. It seems that, in principle, they may want that foul ignored too. I know that the FT has technically ended, but it could conceptually be considered to be part of the FT activity until the ball is rebounded. The idea behind voiding a foul involving a correctable error like this is that the foul would have never occurred had there not been an erroneous FT awarded. And, where is such a foul going to occur...it is almost always going to occur on a rebound.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Tue Oct 26, 2021 at 01:08pm.
Reply With Quote