Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Again, that never was put into place as a rule or a constant interpretation. It was a one year comment and nothing to back it up by rule even after many times of putting in Intentional Foul as a POE like it was last year.
|
Didn't want to debate specific examples, but since I've been sucked into this debate black hole, I might as well put in my two cents.
As far as I know, points of emphasis do not have expiration dates, or a statute of limitations, other than rule changes, or interpretation changes (of which there have been none) that invalidate such.
How long did we expect this 2012-13 Contact Above The Shoulders Point Of Emphasis to last? Only one year? Two years? Three years? Until there was a relevant rule change, or interpretation change? How long?
Also, while intentional fouls were a small part of this Point of Emphasis, it was not an Intentional Foul Point of Emphasis, but rather, a Contact Above The Shoulders Point Of Emphasis containing references to excessive swinging of elbows without contact (a violation), incidental contact, common fouls, intentional fouls, and flagrant fouls.
There are many, many other types of of intentional fouls that do not involve contact above the shoulders, and thus, were not covered in more recent Intentional Foul Points of Emphasis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
That is not a point of emphasis and that's on the rules committee for mislabeling it as such.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Maybe it was mislabeled as a point of emphasis. Probably should have been a rule addition, and written in the rulebook.
|
I agree with Raymond. Stupid NFHS.