Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
My purpose of my thread is not to debate the validity of two specific examples that I have presented.
We've been through such debates dozens of times in the past on the Forum, with logical, and rational opinions offered on both sides.
My intent here is to better prepare my questions regarding the the validity (in general) of old Points of Emphasis, vanished casebook plays, or annual one-time only interpretations to be presented at the 2021 IAABO Fall Seminar by getting additional examples of old Points of Emphasis, vanished casebook plays, or annual one-time only interpretations who's validity has been debated and questioned here on the Forum.
Please try to stay away from debating the validity of the specific examples in this thread.
If yet another debate is necessary, or desired, please start a new thread.
And count me in. Everyone knows that I can't resist a good, lively debate.
|
I'm debating the validity of including old interps or case plays that are not contradictory to the way the rules are currently written. If they are not contradictory, why would a new official not be able to learn the proper adjudication using the current rules in place?
Also want to know why you would include POEs. Their purpose is to emphasize proper enforcement of current rules. An effective POE should disappear.