Hard Contact Relevance ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
Lack of Intent to harm is no more irrelevant than how "hard" the foul was.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Hard illegal contact can be considered excessive illegal contact and thus, an excessive contact intentional foul ... by NFHS standards.
|
Where intentional fouls, by rule, can be premeditated with intent to harm, or not premeditated with intent to harm, also by rule, I doubt that excessive contact intentional fouls could be for "soft" contact. Other types of intentional fouls could certainly be for "soft" contact, but not excessive contact intentional fouls, those will mostly be about "hard" (illegal) contact.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
|