Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
For the record, I am not making a statement about the end of a dribble ... has nothing to do with the end of a dribble.
|
Only the end of the dribble would exclude 4-4-6 from being in full force in this situation. As long as Red #40 is dribbling (he continued to dribble, by definition, throughout the entire play), he must dribble onto the frontcourt to gain frontcourt status, and since the ball was never was dribbled onto the frontcourt, this is a legal play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I think this is one of these situations where there might be a hole in how you define the issue.
|
Like JRutledge, I once thought that this was NFHS "oversight", but once I came across the definition of ending a dribble, it was confirmed for me that an interrupted dribble was, indeed, part of a dribble, and thus this was a legal 4-4-6 play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
For the purpose of this rule, is an interrupted dribble still a dribble?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
Good question. Time for you and Mark to dig deep into some research.
|