Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Did the NFHS ever find it necessary to clarify this as being illegal because the feet never violate?
|
No idea whether the NFHS felt it necessary; I don't think it is.
Case play part (a) (and maybe part (b) depending on how the rule is read), are relevant to rule 9-1-3g. This is listed in the case play.
Case play part (c) (and maybe part (b) ) are relevant to rule 9-1-3d. This could have been listed as a cite in the case play, but most of us can make the leap to find it.