Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
NOT 2.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
1 AND 3. Not mutually exclusive.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
#1 if they are reliable to talk to. #3 if I have time or remember. Likely talking to partners so that might not ultimately happen depending on the conversation with partners.
|
Looks like we've got some consensus here.
Nobody, including me, is going to dig one's way deep into the huddle and distract the head coach from setting up a play with his players, just to satisfy the notification rule.
And yet, I've seen officials give this a try like they're digging for gold.
Notify an assistant coach early, as soon as possible (of course, by rule, this isn't kosher).
Possibly later, if one has the time, after fulfilling one's other duties, followup and confirm the notification with the head coach at the end of the timeout.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Again I think we worry about this too much.
|
Here in my little corner of Connecticut, timeout procedures have been obsessively taught by four different interpreters over forty years as if something really really "bad" happened back in ancient times.
1) Never "bump" the timeout from the granting official to a partner closer to the table. Never. Ever. Under any circumstances. Doesn't matter how far away one is from the reporting area.
2) Only tell a head coach when they have used their final allotted timeout. Never tell a coach how many timeouts they have left, except for the final allotted timeout. Never. Ever. Under any circumstances. Doesn't matter that one wants to be courteous to the head coach to build rapport and gain his vote for the state tournament.
Something tells me that one, or both, of these two guidelines were't followed sometime in the very distant past with disastrous results, which is why our local trainers have been so obsessive about teaching these guidelines over the years.