Quote:
Originally Posted by ilyazhito
I don't think that favoritism occurs only with respect to minorities getting early opportunities. That said, there should be a line between recruiting and supporting minority officials, and promoting minority officials solely because of that status (without reference to criteria such as evaluations, camp attendance, varsity/playoff experience, etc.)...
|
Again, people have been and still are getting ahead that way. Examples of criteria that trumped what I or others did on the court:
-- in a position to award an intramural contract
-- grew up and went to school with a prominent local official
-- played softball
-- worked in a certain profession in their full-time job
-- worked for a certain employer
-- able to provide a business service to the association
And those criteria most often involved people who looked like the person making the decisions because they came from the same circles and backgrounds.
But discussions about "drawing a line" are only brought up when the criteria may be related to demographics.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk