Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Funny you could have sent this email months ago instead of trying to argue what the ruling should have been.
|
While my recent ruling (player control foul) had absolutely nothing to do with the eight year old infamous Point of Emphasis, JRutledge and I discussing it got my curiosity piqued.
IAABO used the 2012-13 Point of Emphasis as a citation in a Make The Call Video Play Commentary posted on January 20, 2021. Yet, as keenly pointed out by JRutledge, IAABO didn't use the same 2012-13 Point of Emphasis citation in the Make The Call Video Play Commentary in this thread (maybe thinking the call was based on shoulder to torso body contact).
What changed in three months?
That's what put me over the top, wanting some answers.
Regarding IAABO's reply to my email.
Worst that can happen? Nothing.
Little bit better? Response from only IAABO, either way, valid, or invalid.
Best outcome? Response from the NFHS, either way, valid, or invalid.
Like I said, I'm not holding my breath.
At least I tried to get some closure.
Still waiting for IAABO's reply to vanishing/disappearing interpretations.