View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 12, 2021, 04:29pm
BillyMac BillyMac is offline
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,955
Best Intentions ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Again if you wanted the rules to stay, then use it in all your rulebooks and casebook ... but did not mention the language in the POE about intentional fouls this year ... It was not a rules change. It was a point of emphasis that did not cover the actual language of the rule ... So if POEs are to stand as law like a court case, then put those somewhere we can reference them. I have no idea what the NF intends, but it is silly to put something in a POE and never mention it again ...I would love more direction, but they have not given any ...


Agree 100%. I couldn't have said it better myself.

While I can't criticize you for deciding that the eight year old Point of Emphasis is null and void, please don't criticize me for be believing that it's still in force. We all know who to criticize. The stupid NFHS.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote