Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official
"Right judgment" is subjective as indicated by the disagreement on this thread. While you may think it's a foul there are plenty of officials and supervisors who would rule (and want this play to be ruled as) incidental contact (opponents in equally advantageous positions).
|
I don't disagree with that and I was on the fence with this call. I could see it being ruled incidental and have probably ruled similar plays as incidental many times.
My point is just that using slow motion to see what really happened should be used as much as possible to educate. Then, knowing exactly what happened, you can make a much better choice about what you think should be called. Then, when you see the same thing in the future, at full speed, you'll remember how it broke down in slow motion and will be able to make a call based on something more than a guess.