Stupid NFHS ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
SITUATION 3: A1, who is dribbling the ball, is intentionally fouled as the signal to end the third quarter sounds. The official administers the free throws as a part of the third quarter and starts the fourth quarter by awarding the throw-in at the spot nearest the spot of the intentional foul. Team B has the possession arrow. RULING: The official correctly administered the free throws as a part of the third quarter. The team will not get the benefit of throw-in at the division line because the quarter ended. No penalty or part of a penalty should be carried over to the next quarter or extra period except when a correctable error is involved. The fourth quarter should begin with a throw-in by Team B, which has the possession arrow. (4-19-3c; 5-6-2 EXCEPTION 3)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
I’m surprised no one has mentioned the confusing ruling in #3 yet. The ruling says the team will not get the benefit of the throw-in at the division line, when I believe what they meant to write is that the team will not get the benefit of the throw-in at the spot nearest the location of the international foul.
|
Nice catch crosscountry55.
Wow? So Team B, which has the possession arrow, starts the fourth quarter with throw-in at the spot nearest the spot of the intentional foul?
I guess that being half right is better than not being right at all?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Last edited by BillyMac; Sat Oct 24, 2020 at 12:22pm.
|