Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
I don't believe the case indicates a violation has occurred. Isn't it possible for A2 to enter after the release then goaltend, thus no FT violation has occurred?
|
Maybe I misread the play. There is (or was) a similar case where A enters early and then goaltends.
Note that case 9.12A is a similar play, except B commits the GT and the ruling calls it a "delayed lane violation."
Maybe all this is left over from the "can't enter until it hits" rule era.