|
Intentional Foul ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
It's an IP. Somewhere there's a case that states something like, "Is it possible for a player in control of the ball to commit a foul that's not a PC? Yes, it could be an IP, a FP or a T."
|
Already knew it, but wanted a citation, and also wanted to continue the discussion comparing generic dictionary adjectives with NFHS rulebook definitions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Altor
... a common foul is a personal foul that is neither flagrant nor intentional. And a player control foul is defined as a common foul. So, if the player with player control commits a flagrant or intentional foul, that foul cannot be common and therefore cannot be a PC foul.
|
Good explanation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
... Intentional Foul, as others have pointed out. You're thinking way too hard.
|
Probably am.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
He is arguing with himself again, that is all.
|
Bingo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky
Perhaps NFHS Case 4.19.6 Situation B? Is it possible for airborne shooter A1 to commit a foul which would not be player control? RULING: Yes. The airborne shooter could be charged with an intentional or flagrant personal foul or with a technical foul.
|
Nice citation, thanks bucky.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
|