View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 26, 2020, 02:45pm
bucky bucky is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
I hate to break it to you, but no one can tell the difference.

It's an IP. Somewhere there's a case that states something like, "Is it possible for a player in control of the ball to commit a foul that's not a PC? Yes, it could be an IP, a FP or a T."
Perhaps NFHS Case 4.19.6 Situation B?

Is it possible for airborne shooter A1 to commit a foul which would not be player control? RULING: Yes. The airborne shooter could be charged with an intentional or flagrant personal foul or with a technical foul.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote