Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
Fair. But the MHSAA gave both reasons, not just that one. So I have to take them at their word that they had multiple reasons for making the change. If the coach communication factor was the primary reason, then just say so!
You’re certainly right about the “person in charge at the moment” effect. But that goes to my criticism that too many decisions like these are based on perception and opinion rather than objective analysis. It’s not good for the game when we keep changing things for change’s sake.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
It's funny, I'm just starting to try and get some 3-person experience and hopefully move up to Varsity at some point (likely in the not-so-near future). I went to work some scrimmage games last Saturday and between trying to keep up with differences between 2 and 3-person PLUS adding the new opposite-table (sometimes but not on every call) rotation in, I looked (and felt) like a complete moron out there. I'm sure the trainer and assignor at that scrimmage were really itching to give me games after that display!
So I totally get your point about not changing things unless there is a clear reason to do so.