Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
Fair. But the MHSAA gave both reasons, not just that one. So I have to take them at their word that they had multiple reasons for making the change. If the coach communication factor was the primary reason, then just say so!
You’re certainly right about the “person in charge at the moment” effect. But that goes to my criticism that too many decisions like these are based on perception and opinion rather than objective analysis. It’s not good for the game when we keep changing things for change’s sake.
|
I do agree with you that change for change sake is not always good. But there is some reasoning that other levels do not go table side on fouls. It works fine at the NCAA Men's level.
Peace