Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump
I know I'm treading out onto very shaky ground here, but unless we're visualizing something very different happening I don't think this is the rule.
Here's what I saw from the OP. The shortstop ran into a stationary runner knocking that runner off the bag and off balance such that when she started toward third she was slower getting started and further from third. Hence I have obstruction.
What I read from what you wrote is that since she wasn't trying to advance when the contact occurred there can be no obstruction even if the contact later impeded her.
|
There is nothing in the OP that indicates the runner even looked in the direction of 3rd base let alone attempt to advance in that direction.
Quote:
|
Consider this play. Popup to moderate depth left field with a runner on third. Runner is planning to tag all the way. Seeing that the fly ball is likely deep enough to score the runner, F5 tackles the runner. F5 disengages completely from the runner, the ball is then caught and the runner stands up now too delayed to score. Surely, this is obstruction? And if that's obstruction why isn't the OP.
|
You think you can compare physical assault to a poor defensive play?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|