Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Huh? What are you talking about?
Which sport does this reference apply to?
|
MTD made a comment about Ohio's history of being anti-official. I responded that the requirement that football officials have in that state to take their books to the field with them (discussed in the football forum in the past) doesn't reflect well on Ohio. Scrounge responded to my comment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
While the OhioHSAA has gotten better, it can be a schmuck from time to time with regard to officials.
MTD, Sr.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official
Requiring football officials to take their books to the field to appease disgruntled coaches doesn't reflect well on them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrounge
This really gets overblown far more than it actually occurs or has practical impact in reality. By rule, a coach in every NFHS state is entitled to ask for a coach/referee conference. All this does is require the books to be there for a quick reference in the extremely unlikely event that it isn't clear, a small extension of the existing coach/referee conference. It almost never gets to that point - but the very few times it has, having the books there has proven invaluable.
|