Quote:
Originally Posted by LRZ
The appellate court ruled that we are not employees, but independent contractors, thus PIAA won the case. PIAA then justified rescinding our insurance because, in part, it could be seen as proof we are employees--an issue PIAA had already prevailed on.
|
Winning that case doesn't mean there can't be more. In today's sue-happy climate, it is sure to resurface.
They just want to avoid giving people a reason to try to stick to them again. It cost them enough. Do people thing their costs from the whole ordeal were going to just get covered with monopoly money?
I can't blame them for reducing their exposure to risk.