Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru_in_Blu
The part I did question was the runner's use of the running lane. But I think it applies more to thrown balls if/when the runner is hit with a thrown ball.
There was a spike mark just past where the running lane begins that might indicate that the runner tried to veer to her right at the last moment. That spike mark was clearly in fair territory which is what the defensive coach argued.
Comments?
|
The running lane rule is about interfering with a play at 1st, not on the way and not specifically with getting hit with the ball.
I don't believe we should ever treat spike marks or footprints as conclusive.