View Single Post
  #169 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 13, 2019, 03:18pm
ilyazhito ilyazhito is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Rockville,MD
Posts: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
At a camp where this was discussed right from the NCAA Committee Meeting.
  • The NCAA Men's is not going to quarters. They would lose a media timeout and they make too much money off of that media timeout set up.
  • Not advancing the ball.
  • Moving the 3 point shot to the international level and not widening the lane.
  • Stopping the clock is not going anywhere. They like the fact they have reduced "blarges."
  • 20 second reset after offensive rebounds.
  • Coaches get timeout request ability in the last two minutes of regulation and last two minutes of overtime.

Finally, we were told the Women's Tournament loses 15 million dollars a year.

The Men's Tournament makes a little over a Billion dollar (YES with a "B"). Just because the women's games does something does not mean the Men's game feels the need to do things.

Some of these have not been officially approved, that will happen in June. There was more changes I am sure, but we only addressed the ones that were asked of the person that sits in those meetings.

Peace
About quarters, they could go to an NBA-style system for media timeouts where they have 3 at the 7, 5, and 3 minute marks of each quarter. The quarter break would be another opportunity for media timeouts, so quarters and media timeouts should not be mutually exclusive. However, this would be something for the 2021-23 rules cycle.

20-second reset on offensive rebounds and increasing 3-point distance make sense. However, why allow coaches to just call live-ball timeouts in the last 2 minutes of the 2nd half and overtime. I would rather keep the rule that is there for the entire game (no live-ball timeouts by coaches), for the sake of consistency and ease of administration.
Reply With Quote