Mon Apr 08, 2019, 06:46pm
|
|
Get away from me, Steve.
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedewed
I think the no-judgment involved here means that if you immediately asked those 2 officials what had just happened, they knew that the ball hit the back of the dribbler's foot, behind him, 6 feet or so away from any part of the defender's body, then he caught the ball, again no question the defender didn't touch, and then he started to dribble again. The booted the call. And I sure hope that part of what happened wasn't that the C didn't want to offend the T, because that is an unfortunate perspective of too many officials. If you are sure of what you see in that situation, step in and get it right. There was no question what the facts were, they just didn't process them.
|
Watch the film. There is no way the C can see this play or make this call. The L if he's looking there? Maybe.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
|