Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
That is not what "Judgement Call" means.
A "Judgement Call" is when what happens is not in question. It is when the official has to decide if what happened (and was clearly observed) is an infraction or not is (is the contact enough for a foul or not, which player is responsible for the contact, or a roll of the hand enough for a carry or not, when specifically does the dribble end as a player catches the ball with one hand).
|
Can you direct me to the exact place where I can find this so-called definition? Because the actual definition of "judgment" does not suggest what you are saying.
All judgment means in a dictionary definitions, "the ability to make considered decisions or come to sensible conclusions."
So let us not add to what we say the word means when there is no such change in the definition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
There is no question about what happened on this play. The official didn't apply a judgment and decide it was not enough to call. The official simply didn't see it or didn't recognize what he saw.
|
Did you talk to him directly? I know I didn't talk to the official personally. Actually, I have not heard him speak at all on the matter. I have no idea what he was thinking or not thinking at the time of the play. I just know there was a violation not called. He might have thought the player did something else that did not make it a violation. He would have been wrong, but I have no idea if he missed the action all together thinking of something else or he
Stepping OOB is not a judgement call either. The player either stepped out or the player didn't step out. When the player steps out, there is no judgment to be applied to determine if you should blow the whistle or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Not seeing something isn't a judgement. It is just not seeing something.
|
His judgment could have been wrong with either not being aware of one part of that play. If there was no judgment then there would have been a call.
Peace