Quote:
Originally Posted by bbman
My real question with this rule is: (again fed)
Runners on first & third (no outs) when batter strikes out & interferes with catcher's throw down to second in attempt to throw out runner trying to steal second. Calling the runner out at third in this situation seems awfully severe!
Thanks
|
I'm seeing an opinion, but no question.
Sometimes rules change, this year was no runner advance on an IP (Fed). But until a rule changes, we apply as stated in the book.