Quote:
Originally Posted by bbman
My real question with this rule is: (again fed)
Runners on first & third (no outs) when batter strikes out & interferes with catcher's throw down to second in attempt to throw out runner trying to steal second. Calling the runner out at third in this situation seems awfully severe!
Thanks
|
Please answer these two questions
1) How did batter interfere?
2) Did the Catcher make a throw?
If in fact the batter did interfere after striking out then they are a retired runner and the penalty for this is runner closest to home is ruled out