Quote:
Originally Posted by HLin NC
If they have:
80 77 65 50 66 88
12 44
22 39
The foul would be for illegal numbering but not formation.
|
I understand that, but
why should that be a foul? Why do they require a minimum # of 50-79 instead of a maximum # of 1-49 & 80-99? If they changed from a min. on the line to a max in the backfield, wouldn't it make sense to make the same type of change to the numbering requirements?