Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
It doesn't matter here:
10.7.1 SITUATION A: B1 takes a certain spot on the court
before A1 jumps in the air to catch a pass: (a) A1 lands on B1;
or (b) B1 moves to a new spot while A1 is airborne. A1 lands
on one foot and then charges into B1. RULING: In (a) and
(b), the foul is on A1. (4-23-5d)
Nothing about B1 initially having both feet touching the playing court.
Nothing about the front of the B1's torso facing A1.
Nothing at all about initial legal guarding position.
Nothing, and yet the NFHS confidently rules this a charge on A1.
Legal guarding position does not matter in NFHS plays like this.
|
I would not necessarily say all of that BM. Just because the words are not there does not mean that the words are not there. In other words, it may not say it, but it references rule 4-23-5d and that rule explicitly discusses obtaining legal position. Additionally, rule 4-23 mentions both feet touching the playing court, initial legal guarding position, etc. Now, that is not exactly what you wrote but I think you get my point. The case may not say things but rules that they reference might.
And not sure why Raymond is going on about someone on the floor setting a screen as screeners are vertical.