|
I said it was a flagrant technical based on one viewing of the film.
In retrospect, after watching the replay, I said I was wrong -- that the ball had not completely cleared the net and it was still a live ball.
But had the ball completely checked the net, it would've been a flagrant technical and calling it an F2 would've been incorrect.
The thing I'm questioning about Jeff's posts is this -- he seemed to say that calling it a live ball foul and being incorrect is somehow better than calling it a dead ball flagrant technical and being wrong. My point is.....wrong is wrong. What's the difference?
As someone who worked enough "low level college games" over the years to tell me I 100% completely hated everything about it, let me just say that you folks that do those games are more than welcome to them.
|