Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Thanks Kevin, you've pushed me close to the edge but not quite over the cliff.
I understand that we can't "willy-nilly" combine these various listed fouls together. Otherwise we could have a personal technical foul.
But we can have a personal flagrant foul, by combining personal and flagrant.
Are you saying that we can't attach any additional descriptor to the words intentional foul (other than personal or technical)?
|
Yes. All fouls are either personal or technical. They also can have additional descriptors -- some of which apply to both; some of which by definition apply only to one; some of which are listed as applying to one.
So, we can have IP or IT. We can have FP or FT. We can have PC_, but not PCT. By definition, it's "called" a Common Personal Foul, but no ever uses the "common" part (except on a test, etc.); there's no "definition" of "common Technical" -- but that's what most of them are (in English usage).