Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
There is no such thing as an Intentional Flagrant Foul. Kind of why the language matters here.
|
What harm could possibly come because a foul is called "intentional flagrant"? Would it really "matter", or is it just a terminology issue?
Would a coach protest that a player shouldn't be ejected because I used the term "intentional"?
Other than the ejection, the penalties are exactly the same. Two shots by fouled player (unless fouled shooting a three pointer that doesn't go in). No players on lane. Offended team gets ball back at spot closest to foul.
Or is it only a problem is one is taking a written test?
And if so, what's the citation that says it's a problem?