Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
That's not what the ruling in the OP says. Case a) has the batter not moving and the ruling says interference inn umpire judgment.
|
I think this pretty much covers it. "Just being hit by the thrown ball does not constitute interference."
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|