Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A
It makes no sense to me why they removed intent from the rule.
|
I can tell you why. It's much easier to judge actions than intent. If we call a runner out for intentionally interfering, he can argue it wasn't intentional. If we don't call a runner out, the defense can argue that it was intentional. We are in effect dealing with the runner's thought process rather than his action. I'm sure the ASA decided it was much easier to rule on what the runner did instead of why he did it.
Now, no one can argue "it was/was not intentional."