Thread: muff or bobble
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 05, 2003, 10:26am
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally posted by AndrewMcCarthy
Kick catching interference - if he's signalled for a fair catch, is in the process of making the catch and K1 hits him, it's KCI.

That's a blanket statement that's simply not true. The ball is muffed into the air by R- he's still in the process of making a catch but most certainly CAN be contacted by K.
Well, I guess I need to say it again. This isn't a blanket statement. It's a statement written to answer THIS PLAY, no other.

Quote:
Based on c it first's further description of the play it sounds like something you'd really have to see. If the ball just rolled forward in his arms I wouldn't allow the contact- if it popped in the air I would.
Well, once again, you'd be wrong. Please cite the rule that states, that R has to catch the ball cleanly in order to still have protection.

Quote:
Would the foul really be "kick catching interference"?? Isn't K contacting R after the catch, thus the ball is dead?
If he hasn't made the catch, how can the play be over?
Reply With Quote