Thread: Screening
View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 06, 2018, 06:50pm
bucky bucky is offline
Official Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 844
On bit of a side note....

Generally speaking, there has to be contact for there to be a foul. Given that concept, I think there should be reform that penalizes illegal things that don't have contact, but affect the defense. This is close to being a good example. If someone sets a screen with their feet wider than deemed by the rules, they should be penalized, specifically if it affects the defense. If there is contact, the call is easy. Now, if the defense runs, because of the wide stance, in an adverse pattern to avoid contact, I think the screener should be penalized. I'm thinking violation. Without contact, we have excessive elbow swinging being a violation. Why not a new one for an illegal screen without contact.

Stupid? Genius? Other acts that might be treated similarly?
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote