Quote:
Originally posted by Theisey
The NF interpretor should be telling the state interpretors what to do, not the states telling the NF interpretor this is what we are going to do becuase "we" don't like your ruling.
That's what is happening and that is wrong!
|
States have the right (unless you can show me some legal issue that I am missing here) to do whatever they like. Especially when the "Mother Ship" cannot get their story straight. So I do not know how the NF can keep any state from coming up with a ruling/interpretation and only listening to one play, but all other information suggest something completly different. If "clean hands" interpretation was not intended, why put it in the rulebook in the explaination?
Peace